Skip to content
Urban Gaming Pro offers in-depth reviews, gaming tips, and …

Tetris Didn't Triumph at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification May Address This Issue

Whenever a major awards ceremony approaches, you'll find a demand for the addition additional classifications to acknowledge underappreciated efforts and fill the passions of fans dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator has already made supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. So would board games, representing a dedicated supporter's campaign. Yet I need to apologize in advance for pushing forward just as with other dedicated enthusiasts, I have a cast-iron argument backing this proposal is the most urgent and significant. This is the request: We need an award type for logic-based games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works isn't exact; opinions vary greatly, and inevitably spark debates concluding with vague boundaries. This explains why cinema institutions steer clear of genre categories. But it is a necessary evil within the realm of gaming, that demonstrate such variety they hardly constitute as a single art form.

To recognize the complete range of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, and to ensure all game types to receive proper recognition, classification by type becomes crucial.

Present Award Structure

Prominent interactive entertainment events presently include classifications covering Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Together, these six categories successfully include many game types, making space possible accommodating various experiences.

Different situation exists for logic-based experiences. There’s simply nowhere to put them. Consider three of outstanding current releases, each quite distinct: the architectural riddles from a specific release, intense tile-matching in a different title, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles of a third title. What category would fit them among existing types? Simply put, no category fits.

Acknowledgment Issues

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers published annually without proper recognition during gaming ceremonies, unless they happen to qualify classification types such as Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested Indie races.

  • One classic puzzle game wasn’t nominated completely in 2014
  • Another imaginative release missed out in 2019
  • A beloved organization game received no acknowledgment that year
  • Limited numbers of puzzle games scraped into independent or mobile categories

Significance of Puzzle Games

Commonly they're modest productions, however the design of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games count as most popular titles worldwide maintaining this status for an extended period.

The famous puzzle experience competes with popular creative games claiming status as most purchased experience; it also contends for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones within interactive entertainment, while interacting across multiple categories.

Recommendation and Reasoning

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter such difficulty. You could fill a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences every year with ease — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude so many good games out.

And to reiterate, these include experiences that otherwise have no home in important events. Puzzle game makers operate at the demanding boundary interactive creation, creating some of the purest expressions of gaming itself. Comparable to cinema stunt performers, they merit acknowledgment. Don't make them wait generations.

SB
By

Shelby Baker

A seasoned gaming journalist with over a decade of experience covering esports and console gaming trends.

Urban Gaming Pro

Type to search articles.